Gato Class Submarine

USA (1941)
About 77 subs

Situation in 1940

In 1939, designs for a new class of submarine, closely resembling the Tambor Class were submitted and approved in response to President Roosevelt’s statement of “limited emergency”.
By 1940, the designing phase for the new class of submarine was complete, and the first boat of the new Gato Class, the USS Drum, was laid down for construction in September of that year. Drum was completed by November of 1941, just in time for the start of hostilities toward Japan.


Launching of USS Robalo at Maniwotoc Shipbuilding Co, 9 may 1943.

Design

The Gato Class of diesel-electric submarines had a length of 311 feet (95 meters), a draft of 16-17 feet (4.8-5.1 meters), and a beam of 27 feet (8.3 meters), with a displacement of 1,525 tons while surfaced and 2,424 tons while submerged.
A conning tower was placed near the front-middle part of the deck where the periscopes and anti-aircraft guns were located. A deck gun was mounted either on the bow or stern of the deck.
The boat was relatively cramped, as 60 crew members had to stay in a space only slightly longer than an American football field for up to months at a time. The smells were often horrible, crew could only shower a couple of times a week, and casualties were high.


USS Bar (SS-220)

Armament

American submarines and the Gato Class in particular were some of the most heavily armed of the war, with armament comparable to some surface ships.
Standard armament of a Gato Class boat was 1x 40mm Bofors Anti-aircraft cannon, 1x 20mm Oerlikon Anti-aircraft cannon, and 1x 3 inch (76mm) or 5 inch (127mm) deck cannon. On some Gato Class subs, the 3 inch gun was replaced with a larger 4 inch one. Additionally, small arms such as the M3 Grease Gun or M1 Thompson were carried for boarding and security, and M2 Browning machine guns were also carried.
As for underwater armament, the Gato had 10x 433mm torpedo tubes, 6 fore and 4 aft. These fired the Mark 10 and often problematic Mark 14 torpedoes, which were later supplemented by the Mark 18 electric torpedo.

USS Trigger
USS Trigger, Mare island Navy Yard, April 6 1942

USS Wahoo, SS-238
USS Wahoo, SS-238

Propulsion

4 electric motors driven by 4 diesel engines powering 2 propellers gave the Gato Class a top speed of 21 knots while surfaced and 9 knots while submerged.
As opposed to German submarines at the time which used diesel transmission on the surface and electric transmission subsurface, American diesel-electric engines used on the Gato and Balao Class submarines used diesel engines to charge electric batteries and power an electric motor. This had multiple advantages, as it allowed for the diesel engines to run at a high speed without breakdown. It also allowed the diesel and electric motors to run at different speeds, giving to freedom for one or more of the diesel engines to be shut off for maintenance while the others kept working.


USS Gato

While at 10 knots, the Gato had a range of 20,000 km (11,000 nm, 12,400 mi), enough to get it from Hawaii to Japan and back.
While submerged, a typical Gato Class boat could stay underwater for up to 48 hours at a speed of 2 knots, however this rarely had to happen as most attacks would be done in half that time.

USS Gato
USS Gato, 30 december 1941

Active Service

The Gato Class served from 1941 to 1969 in 6 different navies. It served in both the Atlantic and the Pacific during World War 2, with the most successful boat sinking more than 60,000 tons of merchant shipping. It can be safely assumed that Gato Class submarines sank in excess of 200,000 tons of shipping, although numbers vary across sources.

The role of the Fleet boats, which included the Porpoise, Salmon, Tambor, and Sargo Classes and later the Gato Class was to protect the US Fleet while on patrol. However, after Pearl Harbor fleet tactics drastically changed, and so the Fleet submarines would have to change as well. Fortunately for the US Navy, the Fleet type submarines were perfect for attacks on Japanese merchant shipping as they were fast, could carry lots of fuel, and were heavily armed.

USS Bashaw
USS Bashaw

As soon as hostilities opened between the Axis Powers and the United States, Gato Class submarines were sent on patrol. Most submarines were based out of Hawaii, Australia, and while it was still under US control, the Philippines. Attacks and patrols were conducted from the Java Sea to the Sea of Japan and everywhere in between.


USS Drum, SS-228 in Mobile, Alabama

There were also a limited amount of Gato submarines that were based out of Scotland for a short time, before they were considered a waste of resources as German shipping in the area was rather limited and thus the subs were sent back to the Pacific theater of operations.
After World War 2, the US Navy still had plenty of surplus Gato Class submarines. While many were sold to allies that were rebuilding their navies, some were kept to carry out other duties that other submarines couldn’t do. These included hunter-killer patrols, radar picket duties, and guided missile carrying.


USS Grouper as AGSS-214, underway circa 1961
Radar Picket Boats

With Kamikaze attacks and air raids becoming more frequent, 6 Gatos were increased in length by 24 feet and had their aft torpedoes removed to make room for more radar equipment. This allowed for early warning against aircraft for American fleets.

Hunter Killer Boats
After World War 2, the Soviet Union began to mass-produce late war German Type-XXI U-Boats under the designation of Whiskey Class. These could be very dangerous to American and European ships in the Atlantic, so 7 Gato boats were converted to dedicated Hunter-Killer subs by adding sonar equipment and removing a pair of diesel engines to reduce sound. A snorkel was also added to allow the subs to stay underwater for a much longer period of time.
Gato Hunter-Killer submarines remained in service until 1959, until they were scrapped or turned into memorials.

Guided Missile Carrier and UDT/SEAL Transport
In 1953, a single Gato submarine (USS Tunny) was converted to be able to fire Regulus nuclear missiles. She served in this role until 1964, when she was converted once again to be able to transport UDT/SEAL teams to and from missions.
USS Tuny, SSG-282 Regulus launching sequence


USS Flounder, SS-251, July 1945

Conclusion

The Gato Class would see 77 models produced at $2.6 million until 1944, when it was replaced by the Balao and Tench classes in production. The Gato would see service in 6 different navies until 1969, when it was ultimately replaced by more modern diesel-electric and nuclear powered submarines.

Even though it wasn’t necessarily the best submarine of World War 2, the Gato Class undoubtedly had an impact on the Pacific Theater and on submarine design in general. Ships, weapons, and tactics were developed just to counter American submarines, with the Gato making up the majority of the US submarine fleet during the early parts of the war.


USS Cod postwar

Specifications

Specifications (Gato class)
-Displacement: 1,525 tons surfaced, 2,424 ton submerged
-Dimensions: 312 x 27 x 17 feet
-Propulsion: 4 Fairbanks-Morse Diesel Engines, 4 Electric Motors, 2 Sargo Batteries, top speed of 21 knots surfaced or 9 knots submerge
-Armament: 1 Bofors 40mm cannon, 1-2 Oerlikon 20mm cannons, 1 3 inch/5 inch deck cannon, 10 533mm torpedo tubes
-Crew: 6 officers, 54-64 enlisted sailors

 

Gallery


USS Gato (1/700)


USS Tench (1/700)

USS Grunion, SS-216
USS Grunion, SS-216

USS Harder, 1945, Mare Island Navy Yard
USS Harder, 1945, Mare Island Navy Yard

USS Mingo
USS Mingo

USS Paddle
USS Paddle

USS Runner
USS Runner

USS Riversides
USS Silversides


US subs Captains documentary

USS Tench, HD 1/400 illustration
USS Tench, HD 1/400 illustration

Balao, Tench, Gato class, HD 1/400 illustrations
Balao, Tench, Gato class, HD 1/400 illustrations

Sources:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleet_submarine
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gato-class_submarine
http://www.mackinnon.org/gato-diagram.html
http://www.pwencycl.kgbudge.com/G/a/Gato_class.htm

Landing Ship Tank

USA (1942-45)
About 1051 ships

Armour Straight to the beaches: LSTs

For this first crossover article with our sister website, tanks encyclopedia, meet the ships that really allowed to carry allied armoured divisions straight to the beach of Italy, France, or many Pacific Islands. Without these, and because of devastated, fortified or absent harbours, tanks would have to wait long after the troops have landed before any infrastructure was ready for them. Those troops then would have been deprived of a very essential tool in modern warfare, impending heavy losses or to be pushed back to the sea.

An introduction: Heavy Landing ships in history

Beach landing operations were nothing new in the XXth century: In the Greek classical and Roman eras, Polybius, Thucydides, Livy, Demosthene and Diodorus all described the Hippagoges, ships tailored to carry horses. In the late Roman era were mentioned the “Thýra-Khelandions”. We already know the Byzantines introduced the “Greek Fire”, a heavy napalm thrower/flamethrower. They also used heavy galleys tailored to carry cavalry (A. Jal, Archeologie Navale, 1840). What we don’t know however were the details of their use or configuration. Did the horses were stored above the rowers ?. Did the horses disembarked directly from frontal hinged doors as it supposed to sound ? Any case, this kind of ship was again described as the “nef huissière” in the Crusades (Hippagines Naves). These ships rigged the latin way (with triangular sails) and had rear doors to left the horse enter. But they probably required wooden ramps to allow the horse to disembark, or from side doors on wharves. This was the norm in conventional landings, after the infantry effectively beach landed on small rowing boats and already secured a solid foothold, up to the Crimean war.

X-Type-craft
WW1 British X-Type landing craft

However, already in 1879 for the landing in Pisagua, the Government of Chile ordered to built flat-bottomed landing craft called Chalanas. These had all the attributes of modern landing crafts and were large enough to a sizable infantry, landing some 1,800 men in less than two hours. In WW1, at Gallipoli, it was back to the usual, improvised methods with infantry landing from rowing ships. Horses and a few vehicles arrive much later when a wharf was constructed. In some occasions, troops that were leaving a ship via side doors were moaned down by Turkish shore defenses.

Landing ships of the the Great War

Only in February 1915 was placed an order for a purposely-designed landing craft. No less than 200 ‘X’ Lighters with a spoon-shaped bow were built. Their first tour of duty was in the Aegean coast of the Gallipoli peninsula. With their drop down frontal ramp they landed the entire IX Corps (Commander Edward Unwin) at Suvla Bay, 6 August 1915, removing the Turkish Garrison. Known as the ‘Beetles’, these 135 tonnes ships carried 500 men each, and where 105’6” long, 21′ wide, and 7’6” deep (32.2 m × 6.4 m × 2.3 m), all with bulletproof sides. Their heavy oil engines gave them 5 knots (9.3 km/h; 5.8 mph).

Interwar Prototypes

For tanks, there were already projects to land British heavy tanks from pontoons at the 3rd battle of Ypres in late 1917. In the interwar, prospects were renewed, at least in the British Navy to carry and land medium tanks. Exercises took place, in which a prototype designed by J. Samuel White of Cowes, was first tested in 1926. This relatively small craft was boxy in appearance, 16 tons, with a flat bow and stern. It was propelled by a a crude waterjet fed by a centrifugal pump driven by a Hotchkiss petrol engine. Eventually three were operated in 1930.

Landing-Ship-Family
US Landing Ship/Caft family

Early Wartime Landing Ships

Back in USA, both the USN and USMC studied the concept of advanced base force, which officially evolved into the Fleet Marine Force (FMF) in 1933. Fleet Landing Exercises took place in 1939 in which Andrew Higgins’s boats for the first time shown their capabilities. The final design was given a ramp, was named LCVP, and mass production started right away. But these crafts were infantry-carrying ones. A slightly larger variant called the LCPR could carry a jeep. But for larger hardware, converted cargos became the norm, including those mass-built to replace the losses in the Atlantic (Liberty ships among others). In the meantime larger infantry-carrying ships like the LSI appeared, and the first vehicles-carrying ones. The first were the Landing Craft Mechanized (LCM) series devised two years earlier, and operated by the Royal Navy.

LSTillus
Wartime LST description

The LST concept

The real incentive began when Prime Minister Winston Churchill demanded an amphibious vessel capable of landing at least three 36-ton heavy tanks directly onto a beach in 1940. It was to be seaworthy and capable of a 10 day cruise in high seas, be inexpensive and simple to maintain. Naval architect Sir Roland Baker essentially designed what became the LCT Mark I, a 372 tonnes ships launched by Hawthorn Leslie in November 1940. It was followed by three series, until the larger Mark 4, tested in combat in the disastrous Allied raid on Dieppe in 1942, the experience of which was closely followed by the personal in charge of the design of an equivalent for US service.

LCT202
British LCT 202.

After December 1941 indeed, the Bureau of Ships was put in charge to design plans for a ship which integrated advices from K.C. Barnaby of Thornycroft which worked on previous LCTs. Also the British evacuation from Dunkirk in 1940 was another motivation to study such designs. Early 1942, the first design was the LCT Mark 5, a 117-foot (36 m) craft, and it was possible to carry and ship it to combat in three separate water-tight sections, on board cargo ships of even an LST. The Landing Ship, Tank however was a much larger design which can carry and extensive payload for amphibious operations. The real challenge was to go from the known working beahaviour of a nimble landing craft, to such behemoth capable to deliver entire armoured battalions. The LST was a true game changer as it was not carried from a mothership but capable of ocean-going, shore-to-shore landings, almost from the training camp to the frontline.

Royal_Navy_HMS_Bachaquero_at_Bone_1942
HMS Bachaquero at Bone, 1942

Development of the LST

The fist true LST was British, the HMS Boxer class (Boxer, Bruiser, and Thruster, ordered in March 1941). It was capable to deliver 13 Churchill heavy infantry tanks, 27 vehicles and nearly 200 men, all across the ocean at a speed of 18 knots. However as it could not have shallow draught each of the three ships (March 1941) were given a very long ramp, stowed behind the bow doors. In November 1941, a British delegation paid a visit to the US United States Navy’s Bureau of Ships for future shared development and also passed their experience to the new design. The latter, called The LST(2) integrated among other ideas from Sir Rowland Baker’s experience with LCTs, and the design was eventually authorized by the Congress in the acts of 6 February 1942, 26 May 1943, and 17 December 1943 as the same time as an enormous shipbuilding programme, unprecedented in US History. The keel of the first LST was laid down on 10 June 1942 at Newport News. Standardization came in October, and twenty-three were in service by the end of the year. From then on indeed, a staggering quantity would be built until the end of the war, at breakneck speed, so much so that the admiralty did not even bother to give them proper names. They received identification numbers like all other landing crafts in service…

LCT-LST-blueprint
LCT-LST blueprint

Design Development of the LST(2)

Initial specification asked sufficient inner buoyancy even when the tank deck was flooded. Top speed was 10 knots as designed, with the same load as the HMS Boxer but drawing only 3 feet forward when beaching. These very large landing ships (at least until the modern assault ships built in the 1960s) were nevertheless challenging for engineers. They had to retain qualities of long cruise ocean-going cargo ships, while being able to not only land hardware on the beach, but also retreat by themselves at sea to take another load, performing vital and relentless rotations from shore-to-shore all along the ongoing amphibious operations. For a start, a flat-bottom ship was a nuisance at sea, especially with a shallow drought. In bad weather, if the excessive roll and pitch was not enough to have everyone on board sea sick to death, the stress on the hull would have gone far enough to break it apart. The problem was eventually solved by John C. Niedermair of the Bureau of Ships.

He basically sketched out the basic design that was to be standardized, which integrated an ingeniously large ballast system, filled for ocean cruise, and pumped out for beaching operations. The second ace in his sleeve was the equally ingenious, massive anchor and mechanical winch system which allowed the ship to pull itself off the beach, ensuring another rotation. At that time, the US were not at war yet and the design was submitted to the British Admiralty on 5 November 1941, immediately accepted. An order came in response for 200 “LST (2)” or Mark 2 to be built through Lend-Lease. Of course one month later, the USA went at war, and this altered and accelerated the process that followed.

Tank_landing_ship_technical_diagram_1959
LST cutaway ad technical overview

Indeed in January 1942 the initial LST 280 feet (85 m) plan was modified as the Bureau of Ships asked for a 290 feets ship, and before the end of the month settled on a 328 feet (100 m) ship, that has to be given also a 50-foot (15 m) beam. These generous dimensions were not only motivated by payload concerns but also to ride higher in the water. Their carrying capacity was nevertheless taken to 2,100-ton (1,900 t) and the larger width allowed to design a more generous bow door opening and ramp of 14 feet (4.3 m), large enough to accommodate all allied vehicles in service. The larger size also imposed thicker plates, 0.375 inches (9 mm) on the bridge, but not hardened, which did not constituted a true protection against shell splinters. The bow under plates were one inch thick to absorb beaching stress. A scale model was produced and tested at the David Taylor Model Basin in Washington, D.C.

Design Specifications

In addition of the ballasts, anchor and winch systems, many other details were worked out, like the ventilation of the tank space, which provided enough draft to allow all tanks to start and warm their engine before landing. A small elevator was also provided to store additional vehicles and payloads on the upper deck. In April 1942 a mock-up well-deck was built and tested for three monthes in real conditions with tanks supplied by Fort Knox (at this location). First beaching test was performed at Quonset, Rhode Island, in early 1943.

LST-761
LST-761

Production

Standardization came in October 1942, although production was well underway already. What was particular in that case it that production plans commenced even before testing were completed, or even scheduled. Coordination between the Bureau of Ships and shipbuilders was performed on the flow by the Material Coordinating Agency, allowing flexibility and revisions during the initial production phases. The programme indeed had received the utmost urgency. The keel of an aircraft carrier was even removed to make room for the first LST. The flat-bottom of the ship allowed to built it along inland waterways, near the steel fabrication yards and supplies. Empty hulls were then often shipped and the operations surveyed by a “Ferry Command” to the coastal yards for completion and fitting-out of the equipments. Remarkably enough, of the 1,051 LSTs built during the war, 670 were supplied by five “cornfield shipyards” in the Middle West ! These were Neville Island, and the American Bridge Company in Ambridge, Pennsylvania, Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. in Evansville, Indiana, Chicago Bridge and Iron’s shipyard in Seneca, Illinois.

LST-532
LST-532

Production simplifications were ongoing constantly to provide faster paces in welding and assembling, so much so, that from the initial four monthes in 1943 the production was reduced down to two monthes. But in between, operational experience had a return and imposed substantial modifications. From LST-491, the elevator was replaced by a hinged ramp lowered to the main deck, placed just before the the bow ramp, allowing much faster rolling operations and landing. From the LST-542 class was added a navigation bridge, water distillation plant, removal of the tank deck ventilator from the main deck and strengthening of the main in order to carry a LCT, an upgrade in armor and the addition of a 3 in caliber gun. They had two General Motors 12-567 diesel engines, two shafts, twin rudders and a Speed of 12 knots (14 mph; 22 km/h). When submerged, the main bay could accomodate 2 to 6 LCVPs. Eventually 1,051 has been actually constructed, 113 LSTs were transferred to Britain, and four found their way later in the Greek navy (see later).

LST-786
LST 786

British LSTs

Although this would be the object of a separated article, some 80 LST Mk.3 (40 cancelled) were built in the UK (35) and Canada (26). They served with marines as diverses after the war as the Royal Australian Navy, Hellenic Navy, Royal Netherlands Navy, Indian Navy. Propulsion was assumed by an Admiralty pattern 3-drum water-tube type boilers (225 pounds psqi). Main engines were 4-cylinder triple expansion, 4-crank type, balanced on the Yarrow-Tweedy-Slick system. Thy developed 2,750 hp (2,050 kW) total. In addition there were the three initial massive ships, 116 m long, 4800 tonnes Maracaibo class. These signaled themselves by their double hinged ramp of 100 ft (30 m) span and could carry 18 × 30 ton tanks or 22 × 25 ton tanks or 33 × 3-ton trucks. The Boxer class was even larger at 120 m and 5400-5900 tonnes.

Crusader-landing-TLC-124
A Crusader tank landing from LCT-124

The LST in action

Unfortunately despite their merits (Winston Churchill would claim later that these workhorses “won the war” for the allies), the LST were not so quite vulnerable despite been quickly nicknamed both the sailors and soldiers “Large Slow Target” or “Large Stationary Target” from their acronym. Their combat debut took place in the Solomon Islands in June 1943 (and not Operation Torch as generally thought were converted ships and LCTs were present). They participated in the invasions of Sicily (Operation Husky), Italy (Baytown, Avalanche), Normandy (Overlord), Southern France (Anvil Dragoon) in the European Theater and proved invaluable in the whole island-hopping campaigns in the Pacific. They had been instrumental in the Philippines, Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

LST_Invasion_of_Normandy
LSTs in Normandy, june 1944

Even with such production however, they were never enough of these ships for the Mediterranean theater or to assume the logistics of amphibious operations in Italy, but after the landings in Normandy, the situation gradually improved. LSTs suffered losses in several occasions, notably a devastating ammunition supply mishandling that cost a chain explosion. These ships could nevertheless absorb punishment and survive, possibly because of their reinforced structure. One survived a collision with a Liberty Ship.

LSTs-Iwo-Jima
LSTs at Iwo Jima, with mount Suribachi behind

Only 26 were lost due to enemy action, 13 more because of bad weather, reef, or accidents. Better still, of the grand total, if many had been mothballed, other scrapped or tested in a nuclear explosion, the majority served yet again in the Korean war, proving themselves at the landing in Inchon, and were later modernized, to served in the Vietnam war (at last named after Counties and Parrishes), despite their age. Also as a side note, LST were not the largest amphibious ships built in WW2: The LSVs of 6000 tonnes with an aft ramp to carry DUKWs, LVTs, LCVPs or LVTs depending of the operations (6 built, 1942-43) or the twenty-five, 4030/7400 tonnes LSDs (landing ships docks) which carried beaching crafts, pioneering the modern assault ships.

Lst-983
LST launching a LVTP-5

WW2 Veterans saved the last LST

In the US, the last was sold for scrap in 1984. But those which served under foreign flags has been maintained in service for some well until the early 1990s. One of these, the Greek L144 in 1994 was one of four LSTs scheduled for replacement. A group of US Veterans deploring the absence of a surviving ww2-era LST battled for years with red tape and sent a delegation to evaluate the ships. One (with the best-looking state) was chosen, anchored in Suda bay in Crete. It was repaired and restored, then undergone a perilous trip across the Mediterranean (yet with more repairs en route as one engine broke up), and then across the Atlantic and Mexican gulf to Mobile, Alabama, where it stands today in its original LST-325 ww2 state in working order, available for visits.

Conversions

In total 83 ships were converted as auxiliaries or special-purpose vessels.
-ARL (Landing craft repair ships): Bow ramp and doors removed and sealed, derricks, booms and winches added to haul damaged landing craft on board for repairs. Auxiliary power and electrical workshops were also provided.

USS_LST-776_with_Brodie_system_front_view_during_testing_1943
LST 776 with Brodie system

-LSTH (Landing Hospital ships): 36 converted. They brought no less than 41,035 wounded men back across the English Channel from Normandy by D-Day+114 (28 September 1944).

-Ammunition Supply Ships: Some were given extra cranes and handling gear, used only for ammunition supply for capital ships.

Improvized aircaft carriers: The USS LST-906 launched a L-4 Grasshopper from a prepared flight deck. While additional L-4s were stowed alongside the deck. Later in the war, USS LST-16, USS LST-337, USS LST-386, USS LST-525, LST-776, and USS LST-906 were all converted to launch planes only but USS LST-393 and USS LST-776 were fitted with the Brodie System for planes take off and landings.

FTD (Fighter Direction Tenders): Three converted in British service. they had AMES Type 11 and Type 15 fighter control radar to provide coverage and coordination on the D-Day landing areas (Despite Luftwaffe incursions were quite reduced). HMS FDT 216 covered Omaha and Utah beaches, HMS FDT 217 Sword, Juno, and Gold, and HMS FDT 13 covered the channel. They resulted nonetheless to the destruction of 76 enemy aircraft total.

Also some ships were converted as MTB tenders, aircraft engine or landing craft repair ships, battle damage repair ships, floating store and depot ships, salvage craft tenders.

Axis LSTs

It should be noted that the Japanese also devised their own LST for their operations, the T101 class delivered from 1943 to 1945. They have been planned by the Navy Technical Department (Kampon) after studying intelligence reports on the LCTs dueing operation Torch. The first No.101 was laid down in November 1943. 103 were planned, and 69 completed (49 for the Navy, 20 for the Army) and 41 lost in action. They have about the same characteristics with a well deck but were lighter at 950 tonnes and 80.50 m (264 ft 1 in) long overall.

Four_Japanese_No101-class_landing_ships
Japanese T101 type LSTs

The Germans also developed their own large landing ship, the Marinefährprahm (MFP), “naval ferry barge” in 1940, originally planned to participate in Operation Sea Lion (The British Invasion). Instead, these relatively smaller ships (220-239t, 47.04-49.84m long) has been mostly used in the Mediterranean theater, and in Norway, for auxiliary duties. Some has been specialized as FLAK-ships, support ships and gunboats, referred to by the allies as the “Flak Lighter” or “F-lighter”. No less than 700 has been cranked up. They had a covered bridge and could carry light vehicles and about 200 men, but not tanks in the basic version. The A1 however was modified to carry captured and modified KV-1/K-2 tanks bound to invade Malta. The derived Italian Motozattera (MZ) planned for the same operation were modified to carry up to three M13/40 medium tanks and 100 fully equipped infantrymen. Probably the most amazing tank landing ship ever imagined was the German Transport Hydrofoil VS-8, but that’s another story…

Links

The LST series class on wikipedia
Full list of LSTs
Various liveries
3d model
Interesting paint scheme
Specs Conway’s all the world fighting ships 1922-1946.

Standard 1944 LST specifications

Dimensions 99,90 x 15 x 1.02-4.29 m (328′ x 50′ x 3′-14′)
Displacement 1780 t standard – 3880 t FL
Crew 108-125
Propulsion 2 screws, 2 TE 3 cyl., 12 boilers, 9775 cv. 19,3 knots max
Speed 22 knots (40.7 km/h; 25.3 mph)
Range 7,000 nmi (12,960 km; 8,060 mi) at 14 knots (25.9 km/h; 16.1 mph)
Armament 1 × 3′ (76 mm), 6 × 40 mm, 6 × 20 mm, 2 × 0.5′ (12.7 mm), 4 × 0.3′ (7.62 mm)
Payload 60 tonnes above deck, 2000 tonnes or 20 tanks & 200 men
Armor 9.5 mm (0.37′) deck

Video: LST documentary

Gallery

sherman-lst-NAF
Sherman M4A1 landing off an LST in beaches of Anzio during the amphibious attack on German forces in Italy dubbed Operation Shingle – 22 January 1944

Canadian-Sherman_off_LST_Sicily
LST landing a Canadian Sherman tank in Sicily, 1943

LST-942_underway_in_late_1944
LST-942 underway in late 1944

dday-gray-2014-LST
Camouflaged USS LST 393 at Muskegon in 2014 that Veterans wanted to repaint grey for 71st D-Day anniversary. The ship operated in North Africa, Sicily, Italy, England, Wales, Ireland and France, and was credited with carrying 9,135 soldiers and 3,248 vehicles.

LST-898
LST-598

LST-inoperation
LST in operations

LST-528-Thule1952
LST-528 at Thule in 1952

LST-594
LST-594

LST-738-burning
LST-738 burning after being hit by Japanese artillery

Graham_County_LST-1176-PuertoRico-1964
Modernized LST-1176 Graham County at Puerto Rico, 1964